Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Case Analysis V And Union Of India And Others Essay
CHAPTER V: CASE ANALYSIS KULDEEP GANDOTRA VS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS The respondent no. 2 proposed an allegation against the petitioner that as he had accepted the amount which was payable to him under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, therefore, the principle of estoppel should be applied. Therefore the petitioner is not allowed or permitted to raise a question on the order dates 13th September 1993, in acceptance of his voluntary retirement. In order to give a justified judgment for this case, reference was made to three cases so that judgment of the Supreme Court can be noted. These cases were Bank of India and Ors. v. Pale Ram Dhania, Punjab National Bank v. Virendra Kumar Goyal and Ors, Punjab and Sind Bank v. S. Ranveer Singh Bava. If the controversy is looked at deeply and the issues that are raised, there are two main questions that crop up, the first question is whether, the acceptance of the request made by the petitioner for voluntary retirement was legal and whether it was valid and what would be the effects of the immediate withdrawal of the voluntary retirement. The second question was to analyze the effect of the receipt of the payments at the end of the petitioner that was payable for the voluntary retirement under protest. In order to get answers for the first question, it was obvious to refer to the case Bank of India and Ors. v. O.P Swarnakar and Ors and to the decision of the Supreme Court in this case. In the above mentioned case, the Supreme CourtShow MoreRelatedSupreme Court Standing On Section 497 Of Ipc. This Part1374 Words à |à 6 Pagesfocused on three cases which are Yusuf Abdul Aziz v The State of Bombay and Husseinbhoy Laljee, Sowmithri Vishnu v Union of India and V. Revathi v Union of India. These cases will discuss about Supreme Court standing on adultery. ï⠧ Yusuf Abdul Aziz Vs. The State of Bombay and Husseinbhoy Laljee The first important discussion regarding the constitutional validity of the section was held in the case of Yusuf Abdul Aziz v The State of Bombay and Husseinbhoy Laljee In this case, Section 497 ofRead MoreCritical Analysis of Good-bye, Montesquieu by Bruce Ackerman1454 Words à |à 6 PagesCRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE ââ¬ËGOOD BYE MONTESQUIEUââ¬â¢ INTRODUCTION:- ââ¬Å"Power must never be trusted without a checkâ⬠. The French jurist Montesquieu introduced the principle of ââ¬Å"Separation of Powerâ⬠(also known as Trias Politica) for the first time in his book L. Esprit Des Lois (Spirit of Laws) published in 1748. This doctrine mean the fact that one person or body of persons should not exerciseRead MoreAk Kraipak Vrs Union of India a Case Study1602 Words à |à 7 Pages| ASSIGNMENT ON | A.K KRAIPAK vs UNION OF INDIA | (A Case Study) | | | | AN ANALYSIS OF THE CASE OF A.K KRAIPAK VS UNION OF INDIA : INTRODUCTION: Kraipak vs Union of india is regarded as an epoch making decision as it demolishes the artificial and conceptualistic distinction between administrative and quasi judicial functionRead MoreBalco Employeeââ¬â¢s Union V. Union of India3691 Words à |à 15 PagesEmployeeââ¬â¢s Union v. Union of India ââ¬â Significance in Administrative Law. BALCO Employeeââ¬â¢s Union v. Union of India ââ¬â Significance in Administrative Law I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................02 II. A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FACTS â⬠¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦...................................03 III. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DECISIONâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦................................05 IV. IMPLICATIONS THAT FOLLOWED THE JUDGMENT â⬠¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦................08 V. CONCLUSIONRead MoreRight of Lawyers to Strike in India: Ex Captain Harish Uppal V. Union of India3867 Words à |à 16 PagesCAPT. HARISH UPPAL v. UNION OF INDIA: Exceptions to the Right to Strike Table of Contents TABLE OF CASES 2 TABLE OF STATUTES 2 Introduction: 3 Research methodology: 4 What is the right to strike and why do we need it? 5 Exceptions: 6 Case review 7 Issues: 7 Analysis: 8 Conclusion 11 Bibliography 13 TABLE OF CASES CASES: 1. Communist Party of India (M) v. Bharat Kumar, (1998) 1 SCC 201, (Supreme Court of India). 2. Ex- Capt. Harish Uppal v. The Union of India, (2003) 2 SCC 45Read MoreDoctrine of Repugnancy in India2797 Words à |à 12 PagesREPUGNANCY IN INDIA ABSTRACT ââ¬Å"The distribution of powers is an essential feature of Federalism. The object for which a federal State is formed involves a division of authority between the Central Government and the State Government. The tendency of federalism is to limit on every side the action of the Government and to split up the strength of the State among co ââ¬â ordinate and independent authorities are especially noticeableâ⬠. A Federal Constitution establishes a dual polity with the Union at the CenterRead MoreSIGNIFICANCE AND RELEVANCY OF DOCTRINAL RESEARCH IN MODERN LAW AND JUSTICE2473 Words à |à 10 Pages List of Cases CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER II: DOCTRINAL RESEARCH ïÆ'Ë MEANING ïÆ'Ë MERITS ïÆ'Ë DOCTRINAL RESEARCH PROCESS ïÆ'Ë DOCTRINAL RESEARCH- AS A METHODOLOGY CHAPTER IV: SIGNIFICANCE AND RELEVANCY OF DOCTRINAL RESEARCH IN MODERN LAW AND JUSTICE CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY INTRODUCTION Read MoreTax Federation V/S Union of India3828 Words à |à 16 PagesFIRST INTERNAL ASSIGNMENT TAXATION LAW SUBMITTED BY: KONIKA JAIN PRN:15010143061 All India Federation Of Tax Practioners (Petitioner) v/s Union Of India amp; others(Respondent) 21st August 2007 (Date Of Judgement) CITATION: (2007) 7 SCC 527 AIR 2007 SC-2990 NAME OF THE JUDGES: S.H. Kapadia amp; B. Sudershan Reddy FACTS: * On 1st June 1998 finance bill was introduced in which Clause 119 of the Notes sought to substitute Sec 65 ,66 and 68 and amendRead MoreResiduary Power Art.2489736 Words à |à 39 PagesResiduary Powerâ⬠To which the statement of object and reasons are as follows: U.S.A is regarded as the example of true federation, whereas India has followed the Canadian model of federation and is regarded as the example of loose federation. In the words of D.D.Basu, the Constitution of India is neither purely federal nor unitary, but is a combination of both. It is a union or a composite of a novel type. It is often defined to be quasi-federal in nature. Under Indian Constitution seventh schedule has importantRead MoreDoctrine of Repugnancy2580 Words à |à 11 Pagesenacting laws all over the world. With the enactment of laws by different legislative bodies all over the world, conflict of laws is an unavoidable issue. However, in this article I will mainly be focusing on the conflict of laws with regard to India. In India, there are three wings of the Government, namely, The Legislature, The Judiciary and the Executive. The legislature has the law making powers for the entire country. The legislature is further divided into the Centre and the State. Doctrine of
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.